The Emerging Law of Artificial Intelligence in Azerbaijan: Between National Strategy and European Regulatory Frameworks
Law and World · Vol. 12, No. 39, pp. 7-20 · 2026
Abstract
Azerbaijan is moving from a general digital-development policy toward a distinct but still fragmented legal and institutional framework for artificial intelligence (AI). This article examines that transition through doctrinal legal research and functional comparative analysis. It evaluates constitutional and personal-data safeguards, the Artificial Intelligence Strategy for 2025–2028, national AI standards, digital-government infrastructure, regulatory experimentation, public-sector AI applications and the binding synthetic-media rules adopted in 2026. The article characterises the emerging model as strategy-led modularism: strategic direction, technical standards, institutional coordination and issue-specific legislation develop incrementally rather than through a single comprehensive AI statute. Comparison with the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law and the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act identifies the principal gap as the absence of enforceable lifecycle duties for high-impact systems, particularly where AI affects individual rights or structures the exercise of public authority. The article proposes a proportionate Azerbaijani Responsible AI Framework based on functional risk classification, impact assessment, documentation, meaningful human oversight, public-sector procurement controls, incident reporting, effective remedies and institutionally credible supervision. It argues for regulatory interoperability with European and international models without mechanical institutional transplantation.
Details
- Publication type
- Journal article
- Author
- Natig Khalilov - Ph.D in Law, Independent Researcher, Azerbaijan
- Journal
- Law and World
- Publication
- September 30, 2026
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 7-20
- Language
- English
- DOI
- 10.36475/12.3.1
- ISSN
- 2346-7916
- Access
- Open access
- Licence
- CC BY-SA 4.0
- Added to catalogue
- Metadata source
- Supplied by the publisher
Areas of law
Keywords
Cite this record
Khalilov, N. (2026). The Emerging Law of Artificial Intelligence in Azerbaijan: Between National Strategy and European Regulatory Frameworks. Law and World, 12(39), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.36475/12.3.1
Khalilov, Natig. "The Emerging Law of Artificial Intelligence in Azerbaijan: Between National Strategy and European Regulatory Frameworks." Law and World 12, no. 39 (2026): 7-20. https://doi.org/10.36475/12.3.1.
@article{khalilov2026_w5xw5q,
title = {The Emerging Law of Artificial Intelligence in Azerbaijan: Between National Strategy and European Regulatory Frameworks},
author = {Khalilov, Natig},
year = {2026},
journal = {Law and World},
volume = {12},
number = {39},
pages = {7--20},
doi = {10.36475/12.3.1},
issn = {2346-7916},
language = {en},
url = {https://lawandworld.ge/index.php/law/article/view/1036},
note = {Open access}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Khalilov, Natig TI - The Emerging Law of Artificial Intelligence in Azerbaijan: Between National Strategy and European Regulatory Frameworks PY - 2026 JO - Law and World VL - 12 IS - 39 SN - 2346-7916 DO - 10.36475/12.3.1 LA - en UR - https://lawandworld.ge/index.php/law/article/view/1036 AB - Azerbaijan is moving from a general digital-development policy toward a distinct but still fragmented legal and institutional framework for artificial intelligence (AI). This article examines that transition through doctrinal legal research and functional comparative analysis. It evaluates constitutional and personal-data safeguards, the Artificial Intelligence Strategy for 2025–2028, national AI standards, digital-government infrastructure, regulatory experimentation, public-sector AI applications and the binding synthetic-media rules adopted in 2026. The article characterises the emerging model as strategy-led modularism: strategic direction, technical standards, institutional coordination and issue-specific legislation develop incrementally rather than through a single comprehensive AI statute. Comparison with the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law and the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act identifies the principal gap as the absence of enforceable lifecycle duties for high-impact systems, particularly where AI affects individual rights or structures the exercise of public authority. The article proposes a proportionate Azerbaijani Responsible AI Framework based on functional risk classification, impact assessment, documentation, meaningful human oversight, public-sector procurement controls, incident reporting, effective remedies and institutionally credible supervision. It argues for regulatory interoperability with European and international models without mechanical institutional transplantation. KW - Artificial intelligence law KW - strategy-led modularism KW - AI governance KW - public-sector AI KW - EU AI Act KW - ხელოვნური ინტელექტის სამართალი KW - სტრატეგიაზე დაფუძნებული მოდულარიზმი KW - ხელოვნური ინტელექტის მმართველობა KW - ხელოვნური ინტელექტი საჯარო სექტორში KW - ევროკავშირის ხელოვნური ინტელექტის აქტი SP - 7 EP - 20 ER -
Related research
The Legal Dilemma of Chemical Castration in Algeria: Balancing Criminal Legality and Human Dignity Amidst Legislative Silence
Lassoued Moussa, Mouada Mohamed Amine
This study aims to analyze chemical castration as a newly introduced mechanism within criminal policy to address sexual offenses against minors, in li…
Legal Governance of Disaster Risks under NEPAD: Establishing Contractual Responsibility for Resilience and Sustainable Development in Africa
Khedidja Ziani, Hichem Makhlouf, Mohammed Halim Limam
This paper examines the strategy of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) for disaster risk reduction and aims to analyze the initiativ…
Guarantees for the Protection of Constitutional Justice in Algeria: From the Constitutional Council to the Constitutional Court in a Comparative Perspective
Constitutional justice in many countries faces multiple challenges that affect the effectiveness of constitutional oversight institutions and the exte…
The Dual Nature of Interim Measures in European Antitrust Enforcement: Administrative Implementation and Judicial Oversight
The European legislature established interim measures as a crucial protective mechanism to avert the impending harm. These measures are applied by var…
The Electronic Administrative Decision between : The Requirements of Effectiveness and the Guarantees of Legal Security
The electronic administrative decision represents a central manifestation of digital transformation in public administration, reshaping how decisions…
The Role of the Writ of Execution Issued by a Notary in Preventive Justice and Effective Enforcement
The present article examines the legal nature of the writ of execution issued by a notary, its functional purpose, and its relation to preventive just…
Discussion
No comments yet · Comments are discussion only. They do not change the bibliographic record.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Start the discussion.