The Compromise Nature of Property Rights in Action – Tolerating Neighboring Nuisances?
Law and World · Vol. 11, No. 34, pp. 60-74 · 2025
Abstract
This article explores the evolving conception of property rights as individual entitlements and socially embedded institutions, emphasizing neighbor law and the duty of tolerance. While civil-law traditions traditionally conceptualize ownership as an exclusive and absolute right, modern legal systems increasingly recognize that property must serve a social function and coexist with the rights and interests of others. Using the Georgian legal framework (Article 175 of the Civil Code), the paper examines how legal norms mediate conflicts between neighboring property owners, particularly where environmental degradation or industrial activity undermines the peaceful enjoyment or economic use of property. The article emphasizes the role of regulatory mechanisms, such as environmental and construction standards, and highlights the judiciary’s critical function in determining the permissible scope of interference on a case-by-case basis. Drawing upon the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, it analyzes how the Court balances individual property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 with broader concerns addressed under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. By integrating national legal norms with international human rights standards, the article aims to delineate a coherent framework for resolving property-related conflicts in a manner that respects both private autonomy and the public interest.
Details
- Publication type
- Journal article
- Author
- Nino Meskhishvili - Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, University of Georgia, Georgia
- Journal
- Law and World
- Publication
- June 30, 2025
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 60-74
- Language
- English
- DOI
- 10.36475/11.2.6
- ISSN
- 2346-7916
- Institutions
- University of Georgia
- Access
- Open access
- Licence
- CC BY-SA 4.0
- Added to catalogue
- Metadata source
- Supplied by the publisher
Areas of law
Keywords
Cite this record
Meskhishvili, N. (2025). The Compromise Nature of Property Rights in Action – Tolerating Neighboring Nuisances?. Law and World, 11(34), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.36475/11.2.6
Meskhishvili, Nino. "The Compromise Nature of Property Rights in Action – Tolerating Neighboring Nuisances?." Law and World 11, no. 34 (2025): 60-74. https://doi.org/10.36475/11.2.6.
@article{meskhishvili2025_n8qm99,
title = {The Compromise Nature of Property Rights in Action – Tolerating Neighboring Nuisances?},
author = {Meskhishvili, Nino},
year = {2025},
journal = {Law and World},
volume = {11},
number = {34},
pages = {60--74},
doi = {10.36475/11.2.6},
issn = {2346-7916},
language = {en},
url = {https://lawandworld.ge/index.php/law/article/view/789},
note = {Open access}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Meskhishvili, Nino TI - The Compromise Nature of Property Rights in Action – Tolerating Neighboring Nuisances? PY - 2025 JO - Law and World VL - 11 IS - 34 SN - 2346-7916 DO - 10.36475/11.2.6 LA - en UR - https://lawandworld.ge/index.php/law/article/view/789 AB - This article explores the evolving conception of property rights as individual entitlements and socially embedded institutions, emphasizing neighbor law and the duty of tolerance. While civil-law traditions traditionally conceptualize ownership as an exclusive and absolute right, modern legal systems increasingly recognize that property must serve a social function and coexist with the rights and interests of others. Using the Georgian legal framework (Article 175 of the Civil Code), the paper examines how legal norms mediate conflicts between neighboring property owners, particularly where environmental degradation or industrial activity undermines the peaceful enjoyment or economic use of property. The article emphasizes the role of regulatory mechanisms, such as environmental and construction standards, and highlights the judiciary’s critical function in determining the permissible scope of interference on a case-by-case basis. Drawing upon the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, it analyzes how the Court balances individual property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 with broader concerns addressed under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. By integrating national legal norms with international human rights standards, the article aims to delineate a coherent framework for resolving property-related conflicts in a manner that respects both private autonomy and the public interest. KW - Property rights KW - environmental disturbance KW - tolerating neighboring nuisance KW - საკუთრების უფლება KW - გარემოსდაცვითი ზემოქმედება KW - მეზობლისგან მომდინარე ზემოქმედების მოთმენა SP - 60 EP - 74 ER -
Related research
The Electronic Administrative Decision between : The Requirements of Effectiveness and the Guarantees of Legal Security
The electronic administrative decision represents a central manifestation of digital transformation in public administration, reshaping how decisions…
The Specificities of Seabed Disputes in Light of the Law of the Sea
Certainly, the proclamation by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of a new maritime area, which is the Seabed Area, applying…
Legal Governance of Disaster Risks under NEPAD: Establishing Contractual Responsibility for Resilience and Sustainable Development in Africa
Khedidja Ziani, Hichem Makhlouf, Mohammed Halim Limam
This paper examines the strategy of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) for disaster risk reduction and aims to analyze the initiativ…
Guarantees for the Protection of Constitutional Justice in Algeria: From the Constitutional Council to the Constitutional Court in a Comparative Perspective
Constitutional justice in many countries faces multiple challenges that affect the effectiveness of constitutional oversight institutions and the exte…
The Dual Nature of Interim Measures in European Antitrust Enforcement: Administrative Implementation and Judicial Oversight
The European legislature established interim measures as a crucial protective mechanism to avert the impending harm. These measures are applied by var…
Features of the Implementation of the American “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” Doctrine in Georgian Criminal Procedural Legislation, Comparative Analysis, and Assessment of International Relevance
Article 72 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, in comparison with the previous Criminal Procedure Code, provides a limited list of items that m…
Discussion
No comments yet · Comments are discussion only. They do not change the bibliographic record.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Start the discussion.