The Capabilities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Justice System
Law and World · Vol. 11, No. 35, pp. 142-153 · 2025
Abstract
In the context of globalization, one of the key pillars for improving the effectiveness of a country’s legal system, ensuring access to justice, and enhancing the quality of legal proceedings lies in innovative and technological advancement. The ongoing global digitization process offers a broad range of services in every field, including the judiciary, enabling improved access to justice for citizens from various social backgrounds through digital transformation. It also allows the integration of artificial intelligence tools into case review and decision-making processes, making the administration of justice faster, more flexible, and efficient. Moreover, the implementation of AI technologies helps create essential tools and mechanisms that, through an integrated approach, contribute to solving global legal challenges—such as prolonged legal proceedings, overburdened judges, limited access to justice, inefficiencies in the legal system, and more.
The primary purpose of artificial intelligence is to simplify administrative processes, increase transparency and efficiency in decision-making, and assist judges, prosecutors, and lawyers in processing documents. AI enables the analysis of legal documents, anonymization of court decisions, and comparison and compliance checks of contracts. These capabilities significantly reduce human error and save time.
This article discusses examples from various countries where AI is applied in both legal research and the modeling of judicial proceedings. It is essential to emphasize that the successful use of this technology depends not only on its technical capabilities but also on the legal and ethical frameworks that protect citizens’ rights.
Details
- Publication type
- Journal article
- Author
- Magda Beruashvili - Phd Candidate of Business and Technology University, Georgia
- Journal
- Law and World
- Publication
- September 30, 2025
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 142-153
- Language
- English
- DOI
- 10.36475/11.3.10
- ISSN
- 2346-7916
- Institutions
- Business and Technology University
- Access
- Open access
- Licence
- CC BY-SA 4.0
- Added to catalogue
- Metadata source
- Supplied by the publisher
Areas of law
Keywords
Cite this record
Beruashvili, M. (2025). The Capabilities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Justice System. Law and World, 11(35), 142-153. https://doi.org/10.36475/11.3.10
Beruashvili, Magda. "The Capabilities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Justice System." Law and World 11, no. 35 (2025): 142-153. https://doi.org/10.36475/11.3.10.
@article{beruashvili2025_x508p9,
title = {The Capabilities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Justice System},
author = {Beruashvili, Magda},
year = {2025},
journal = {Law and World},
volume = {11},
number = {35},
pages = {142--153},
doi = {10.36475/11.3.10},
issn = {2346-7916},
language = {en},
url = {https://lawandworld.ge/index.php/law/article/view/848},
note = {Open access}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Beruashvili, Magda TI - The Capabilities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Justice System PY - 2025 JO - Law and World VL - 11 IS - 35 SN - 2346-7916 DO - 10.36475/11.3.10 LA - en UR - https://lawandworld.ge/index.php/law/article/view/848 AB - In the context of globalization, one of the key pillars for improving the effectiveness of a country’s legal system, ensuring access to justice, and enhancing the quality of legal proceedings lies in innovative and technological advancement. The ongoing global digitization process offers a broad range of services in every field, including the judiciary, enabling improved access to justice for citizens from various social backgrounds through digital transformation. It also allows the integration of artificial intelligence tools into case review and decision-making processes, making the administration of justice faster, more flexible, and efficient. Moreover, the implementation of AI technologies helps create essential tools and mechanisms that, through an integrated approach, contribute to solving global legal challenges—such as prolonged legal proceedings, overburdened judges, limited access to justice, inefficiencies in the legal system, and more. The primary purpose of artificial intelligence is to simplify administrative processes, increase transparency and efficiency in decision-making, and assist judges, prosecutors, and lawyers in processing documents. AI enables the analysis of legal documents, anonymization of court decisions, and comparison and compliance checks of contracts. These capabilities significantly reduce human error and save time. This article discusses examples from various countries where AI is applied in both legal research and the modeling of judicial proceedings. It is essential to emphasize that the successful use of this technology depends not only on its technical capabilities but also on the legal and ethical frameworks that protect citizens’ rights. KW - Justice system KW - AI KW - ethical challenges KW - analysis KW - regulation KW - მართლმსაჯულების სისტემა KW - ხელოვნური ინტელექტი KW - ეთიკური გამოწვევები KW - ანალიზი KW - რეგულირება SP - 142 EP - 153 ER -
Related research
The Electronic Administrative Decision between : The Requirements of Effectiveness and the Guarantees of Legal Security
The electronic administrative decision represents a central manifestation of digital transformation in public administration, reshaping how decisions…
The Specificities of Seabed Disputes in Light of the Law of the Sea
Certainly, the proclamation by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of a new maritime area, which is the Seabed Area, applying…
Legal Governance of Disaster Risks under NEPAD: Establishing Contractual Responsibility for Resilience and Sustainable Development in Africa
Khedidja Ziani, Hichem Makhlouf, Mohammed Halim Limam
This paper examines the strategy of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) for disaster risk reduction and aims to analyze the initiativ…
Guarantees for the Protection of Constitutional Justice in Algeria: From the Constitutional Council to the Constitutional Court in a Comparative Perspective
Constitutional justice in many countries faces multiple challenges that affect the effectiveness of constitutional oversight institutions and the exte…
The Dual Nature of Interim Measures in European Antitrust Enforcement: Administrative Implementation and Judicial Oversight
The European legislature established interim measures as a crucial protective mechanism to avert the impending harm. These measures are applied by var…
Features of the Implementation of the American “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” Doctrine in Georgian Criminal Procedural Legislation, Comparative Analysis, and Assessment of International Relevance
Article 72 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, in comparison with the previous Criminal Procedure Code, provides a limited list of items that m…
Discussion
No comments yet · Comments are discussion only. They do not change the bibliographic record.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Start the discussion.