Legal Implications of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Comparative Legal Analysis
Law and World · Vol. 11, No. 36, pp. 40-59 · 2025
Abstract
The paper will discuss legal aspects of renewable energy technologies by comparing India, the United States, and Germany. It integrates both case law analysis and a framework of Policy evaluation to identify three determinative factors in the outcome of renewable energy: regulatory certainty, institutional capacity, and market integration. The results indicate that investors are confident in predictable and enforceable regulations, as seen in Germany, through stable feed-in tariffs, in contrast to the uncertainty of the U.S. tax incentives and the poor enforcement of Renewable Purchase Obligations in India. Institutional strength is highly connected to project acceleration, and delays in the U.S and Indian cases as compared to a relatively consistent regulatory framework in Germany. Reduction of cost comes with competition mechanisms like auctions, but their efficiency depends on an open and enforceable legal framework. The paper concludes that cost-effective, socially legitimate, and investor-friendly renewable energy transitions cannot be attained without the presence of adaptive and coherent legal frameworks that are based on the principles of enforceability, institutional robustness, and policy coherence.
Details
- Publication type
- Journal article
- Author
- Jamshid Kazimi - Ph.D. in Law, University Institute of Legal Studies, Chandigarh University, Punjab, India
- Journal
- Law and World
- Publication
- December 30, 2025
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 40-59
- Language
- English
- DOI
- 10.36475/11.4.3
- ISSN
- 2346-7916
- Institutions
- Chandigarh University
- Access
- Open access
- Licence
- CC BY-SA 4.0
- Added to catalogue
- Metadata source
- Supplied by the publisher
Areas of law
Keywords
Cite this record
Kazimi, J. (2025). Legal Implications of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Comparative Legal Analysis. Law and World, 11(36), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.36475/11.4.3
Kazimi, Jamshid. "Legal Implications of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Comparative Legal Analysis." Law and World 11, no. 36 (2025): 40-59. https://doi.org/10.36475/11.4.3.
@article{kazimi2025_0dzfg5,
title = {Legal Implications of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Comparative Legal Analysis},
author = {Kazimi, Jamshid},
year = {2025},
journal = {Law and World},
volume = {11},
number = {36},
pages = {40--59},
doi = {10.36475/11.4.3},
issn = {2346-7916},
language = {en},
url = {https://lawandworld.ge/index.php/law/article/view/918},
note = {Open access}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Kazimi, Jamshid TI - Legal Implications of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Comparative Legal Analysis PY - 2025 JO - Law and World VL - 11 IS - 36 SN - 2346-7916 DO - 10.36475/11.4.3 LA - en UR - https://lawandworld.ge/index.php/law/article/view/918 AB - The paper will discuss legal aspects of renewable energy technologies by comparing India, the United States, and Germany. It integrates both case law analysis and a framework of Policy evaluation to identify three determinative factors in the outcome of renewable energy: regulatory certainty, institutional capacity, and market integration. The results indicate that investors are confident in predictable and enforceable regulations, as seen in Germany, through stable feed-in tariffs, in contrast to the uncertainty of the U.S. tax incentives and the poor enforcement of Renewable Purchase Obligations in India. Institutional strength is highly connected to project acceleration, and delays in the U.S and Indian cases as compared to a relatively consistent regulatory framework in Germany. Reduction of cost comes with competition mechanisms like auctions, but their efficiency depends on an open and enforceable legal framework. The paper concludes that cost-effective, socially legitimate, and investor-friendly renewable energy transitions cannot be attained without the presence of adaptive and coherent legal frameworks that are based on the principles of enforceability, institutional robustness, and policy coherence. KW - Renewable energy law KW - comparative legal analysis KW - institutional capacity KW - investor confidence KW - policy innovation KW - განახლებადი ენერგიის სამართალი KW - შედარებით-სამართლებრივი ანალიზი KW - ინსტიტუციური შესაძლებლობები KW - ინვესტორთა ნდობა KW - პოლიტიკის ინოვაცია SP - 40 EP - 59 ER -
Related research
The Electronic Administrative Decision between : The Requirements of Effectiveness and the Guarantees of Legal Security
The electronic administrative decision represents a central manifestation of digital transformation in public administration, reshaping how decisions…
The Specificities of Seabed Disputes in Light of the Law of the Sea
Certainly, the proclamation by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of a new maritime area, which is the Seabed Area, applying…
Legal Governance of Disaster Risks under NEPAD: Establishing Contractual Responsibility for Resilience and Sustainable Development in Africa
Khedidja Ziani, Hichem Makhlouf, Mohammed Halim Limam
This paper examines the strategy of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) for disaster risk reduction and aims to analyze the initiativ…
Guarantees for the Protection of Constitutional Justice in Algeria: From the Constitutional Council to the Constitutional Court in a Comparative Perspective
Constitutional justice in many countries faces multiple challenges that affect the effectiveness of constitutional oversight institutions and the exte…
The Dual Nature of Interim Measures in European Antitrust Enforcement: Administrative Implementation and Judicial Oversight
The European legislature established interim measures as a crucial protective mechanism to avert the impending harm. These measures are applied by var…
Features of the Implementation of the American “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” Doctrine in Georgian Criminal Procedural Legislation, Comparative Analysis, and Assessment of International Relevance
Article 72 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, in comparison with the previous Criminal Procedure Code, provides a limited list of items that m…
Discussion
No comments yet · Comments are discussion only. They do not change the bibliographic record.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Start the discussion.